Member-only story

The Withdrawal of Correspondent Banking Relationships: A Global Financial Risk

Wayne Carter

·6.9k Followers· Follow

Published in The Withdrawal Of Correspondent Banking Relationships

4 min read · 2 weeks before

1.1k View Claps

68 Respond

Save

Listen

<meta name="keywords" content="correspondent banking, de-risking, financial inclusion, financial stability, money laundering, sanctions"> <link rel="stylesheet" href="style.css"> Correspondent banking relationships are essential for the functioning of the global financial system. They allow banks to conduct transactions on behalf of their customers in other countries. However, in recent years there has been a growing trend of banks withdrawing from these relationships, particularly with banks in developing countries. This trend is known as "de-risking." De-risking is driven by a number of factors, including: * **Increased regulatory pressure on banks to comply with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing regulations.** These regulations require banks to conduct due diligence on their customers and to report any suspicious transactions. This can be costly and time-consuming, and banks are increasingly reluctant to take on the risk of ng business with banks in countries that are perceived to be high-risk. * **The rise of financial technology (fintech) companies.** Fintech companies are offering new and more efficient ways to conduct financial transactions. This is putting pressure on traditional banks to reduce their costs and improve their services. As a result, banks are increasingly focusing on their core&#19994;&#21153; and withdrawing from non-core activities, such as correspondent banking. * **The political and economic instability in many developing countries.** This instability makes it difficult for banks to conduct business in these countries and to assess the risks involved. As a result, banks are increasingly reluctant to enter into correspondent banking relationships with banks in these countries. The withdrawal of correspondent banking relationships has a number of negative consequences, including: * **Reduced financial inclusion.** Correspondent banking relationships are essential for providing financial services to people in developing countries. Without these relationships, people in these countries will have difficulty accessing banking services, such as sending and receiving money, making payments, and saving money. * **Increased financial instability.** The withdrawal of correspondent banking relationships can lead to financial instability in developing countries. This is because banks in these countries will have difficulty accessing the global financial system and will be more vulnerable to shocks. * **Increased poverty.** The withdrawal of correspondent banking relationships can lead to increased poverty in developing countries. This is because people in these countries will have difficulty accessing financial services that they need to start and grow businesses. There are a number of things that policymakers and financial institutions can do to address the problem of de-risking. These include: * **Providing regulatory relief to banks that conduct business with banks in developing countries.** This could include reducing the due diligence requirements for these banks and providing them with more time to comply with the regulations. * **Supporting the development of fintech companies in developing countries.** Fintech companies can offer new and more efficient ways to conduct financial transactions. This can help to reduce the costs of compliance for banks and make it easier for them to do business with banks in developing countries. * **Promoting political and economic stability in developing countries.** This will make it easier for banks to conduct business in these countries and to assess the risks involved. The withdrawal of correspondent banking relationships is a global financial risk that needs to be addressed. Policymakers and financial institutions need to work together to find solutions to this problem. The withdrawal of correspondent banking relationships is a serious problem that has a number of negative consequences for developing countries. Policymakers and financial institutions need to work together to find solutions to this problem.